Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether diesel engine pumping sets were taxable as agricultural implements up to 6 September 1981 and as machinery thereafter, and whether the later Supreme Court decision on the same commodity governed the classification.
Analysis: The relevant notifications and the retrospective amendment showed that the exclusion from agricultural implements initially applied only to water pumps, while pumping sets were not specifically brought within the machinery entry until the later notification effective from 7 September 1981. The later Supreme Court decision in the assessee's own case treated pumping sets and water pumps as distinct commodities and held that the retrospective amendment did not take pumping sets out of the agricultural-implements entry. Where two Supreme Court decisions of equal strength appear to conflict, the later decision is binding. On that basis, diesel engine pumping sets remained agricultural implements for the period up to 6 September 1981, but from 7 September 1981 they fell within the machinery entry by reason of the specific amendment.
Conclusion: The classification was accepted as agricultural implement up to 6 September 1981 and as machinery from 7 September 1981 onwards, with the revisions disposed of accordingly.