Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the raid and search action taken under section 45 of the Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994, including the sealing of business premises, was lawful and justified on the basis of recorded reasons suggesting attempted tax evasion.
Analysis: Section 45 empowered the specified commercial tax authorities, and in emergent cases the Commissioner, to investigate and search premises where there was reason to suspect evasion of tax. The Commissioner had recorded reasons in writing before authorising the action, and the record showed collection of material indicating suspected evasion through paper transactions and inter-State sale patterns. The Court held that it was not required to test the adequacy of the reasons once the statutory requirement of recorded satisfaction was met. The sealing of premises during the raid was also upheld because section 45(5)(a) expressly authorised sealing or breaking open of doors, boxes, lockers, safes, and similar places for the duration of the raid. The petitioner's objections on arbitrariness, lack of material, and denial of opportunity in the assessment process were rejected on the facts of the case.
Conclusion: The raid, search, and temporary sealing action under section 45 were valid and not arbitrary.