Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether export sales made from West Bengal could be treated as sales made in West Bengal for the purpose of section 5(1)(bb) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, and whether declaration forms could be refused on the footing that such forms were misused.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the later amendment to section 17 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994, by the West Bengal Sales Tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 1997, introduced an Explanation stating that expressions such as "for resale by him in West Bengal" and "for sales by him in West Bengal" include inter-State sales and export sales. The Tribunal treated section 17 of the 1994 Act as in pari materia with section 5(1)(bb) of the 1941 Act and accepted the respondents' concession that the legislative intention under the earlier provision was the same. On that basis, export sales effected from West Bengal were held to fall within the expression "sales made in West Bengal" for the purpose of the earlier statutory scheme, and refusal of declaration forms on the ground of misuse was unsustainable.
Conclusion: Export sales made by the applicant were to be treated as sales made in West Bengal under section 5(1)(bb) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, and the order refusing declaration forms was quashed; the applicant was held entitled to issuance of the declaration forms.
Ratio Decidendi: Where two provisions are in pari materia and the later enactment clarifies the legislative intention, the earlier provision may be construed consistently so that export sales from the State are treated as sales within the State for the statutory purpose in question.