Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Appellate Tribunal's finding that the assessee's firms were engaged in the manufacture of new gold jewellery from old gold ornaments was a finding of fact giving rise to no question of law, and whether the Revenue was entitled to a reference on the assessee's claimed exemption under the Wealth-tax Act.
Analysis: The Tribunal found on the evidence that the firms in which the assessee was a partner purchased old gold ornaments, engaged goldsmiths at their premises, and manufactured new gold jewellery, with vouchers showing manufacture-related details such as making charges, weight, purity, and wastage. The Revenue's contrary assertion that only polishing was done was unsupported. As the Tribunal's conclusion rested on appreciation of facts and evidence, it was a pure finding of fact.
Conclusion: No question of law arose from the Tribunal's finding, and the Revenue's application for reference failed.