TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order withholding refund under section 14-D of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 was valid when the Commissioner had not recorded the requisite opinion that grant of refund was likely to adversely affect the Revenue, and whether the matter required fresh consideration.
Analysis: Section 14-D empowers withholding of refund only where the order giving rise to the refund is under appeal or further proceeding and the Commissioner forms and records an opinion that granting the refund is likely to adversely affect the Revenue. A mere reference to the provision or pendency of appeal is insufficient. The opinion must exist on the record and be based on relevant material. The records showed no recorded opinion by the Commissioner and no proper enquiry into the assessee's creditworthiness before withholding the refund. The absence of such foundational exercise meant that the statutory condition precedent was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The withholding order was invalid and was set aside. The matter was remitted to the Commissioner for fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded in challenging the refund-withholding order, but the refund claim itself was left for reconsideration by the Commissioner after proper application of mind to the statutory requirements.
Ratio Decidendi: A refund can be withheld under section 14-D only if the Commissioner records a reasoned opinion, founded on relevant material, that granting the refund is likely to adversely affect the Revenue.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
