Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether retrospective cancellation of the selling dealers' registration could justify treating the petitioner's bona fide purchases as purchases from unregistered dealers and sustain the assessment and provisional attachment orders.
Analysis: The governing principle is that a purchasing dealer is entitled to rely on the seller's registration certificate while it remains effective, and a later retrospective cancellation does not, by itself, prejudice transactions already entered into on that basis. The protection continues where the purchases are genuine and without intent to defraud revenue. On the facts, the assessment had to be re-examined in light of this principle and the State's own stand as recorded in the earlier decision, which recognised that genuine transactions are not affected by retrospective cancellation under section 30AA and the connected provisos.
Conclusion: The petitioner succeeded. The assessment order and the consequential attachment orders were quashed, and the matter was directed to be reconsidered in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Retrospective cancellation of a seller's registration does not invalidate bona fide and genuine purchases made while the registration was current, and such transactions must be assessed on their own genuineness rather than on the later cancellation alone.