Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the explanatory note to Rule 3 of the Bihar Sales Tax Supplementary (Deferment of Tax) Rules, 1990, limiting deferment to incremental production over and above installed capacity, was inconsistent with the Industrial Policy Resolution, 1989, and whether the petitioner was entitled to deferment of sales tax on production increased beyond its pre-expansion level.
Analysis: The policy framed a broad incentive for existing industrial units undertaking expansion, while the Rules made the mechanism workable by prescribing eligibility conditions and explaining incremental production as production over and above installed capacity. The Court held that the policy did not expressly guarantee benefit on all production above the pre-expansion level, and the Rules did not curtail any vested policy benefit. In taxation matters the State has wider latitude, and the delegated rule merely clarified the extent of the incentive without negating the policy. The challenge to the explanatory note was also considered belated, as the provision had remained in force for a long period and disturbing it would unsettle settled arrangements.
Conclusion: The explanatory note and Rule 3 were upheld as valid and not ultra vires the Industrial Policy Resolution, 1989. The petitioner was not entitled to deferment of sales tax beyond production over and above installed capacity, and the writ application failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a policy grants a fiscal incentive in broad terms, delegated rules may validly clarify the extent of the benefit if they do not contradict or withdraw the substantive policy benefit; in such cases, incremental production may be confined to production above installed capacity.