Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to refund of the penalty amount with interest and costs after the appellate authority had set aside the penalty order.
Analysis: The penalty imposed under section 14-B of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 had been set aside in appeal and the department had not challenged that order. The refund, therefore, ought to have been made within a reasonable time. Retention of the amount for more than 11 years was arbitrary and unjustified. In view of section 12(3) of the Act, the respondents were liable to pay interest on the refunded amount. The conduct of the respondents also justified an award of costs, though only token costs were granted.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to refund, interest, and costs.