Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to exemption from payment of purchase tax and sales tax beyond Rs. 6 crores under the industrial policy and incentive code.
Analysis: The industrial policy notified in 1989 contemplated exemption up to Rs. 6 crores. Although the original rules contained a higher ceiling of Rs. 8 crores, the inconsistency was corrected by a later notification amending rule 6.2 and substituting Rs. 6 crores for Rs. 8 crores. Once the amendment was duly notified and published, the amended ceiling governed the entitlement of industrial units. Administrative mistakes in issuing certificates contrary to the amended rule could not enlarge the benefit beyond the limit fixed by the validly amended policy framework.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to exemption beyond Rs. 6 crores and the claim for a higher exemption failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A benefit under an industrial incentive scheme cannot be claimed beyond the limit fixed by the validly notified and published amended rule, even if earlier certificates or administrative acts mentioned a higher amount.