Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount deposited pursuant to the penalty order under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 had to be refunded with interest after the appellate authority accepted the appeal.
Analysis: The appellate order dated 26 November 1997 set aside the original penalty order, with the result that the petitioner became entitled to refund of the deposited amount from the next day. The respondents retained the money despite repeated requests and the denial of receipt of the refund request was not categorical. A later order confirming penalty could not defeat the accrued right to refund, since the earlier penalty order had ceased to exist after the appellate decision and no retrospective penalty could be imposed under the statute. Interest was held payable under section 12 of the Act from the date the refund became due until actual payment.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to refund of Rs. 50,000 with admissible interest from 27 November 1997 until payment.
Ratio Decidendi: Once a penalty order is set aside in appeal, the assessee acquires an enforceable right to refund of the amount deposited under that order, and the retaining authority cannot defeat that right by a subsequent order with retrospective effect.