Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revised show cause notice proposing revision of assessment under section 20 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was without jurisdiction or invalid for want of power to add further grounds, and whether interference under article 226 was warranted.
Analysis: The petitioner had not yet been subjected to a final revisional order on the earlier notice, and no statutory bar was shown against the revising authority supplementing the notice with additional grounds before final adjudication. The power to raise additional grounds in the course of proposed revision was treated as incidental to the revisional power under section 20. The Court also noted that the revised notice served the requirement of fairness by apprising the dealer of all grounds on which revision was proposed, and therefore did not offend the principles of natural justice. In view of the availability of statutory remedies, the writ court saw no extraordinary circumstance for direct interference.
Conclusion: The revised show cause notice was held to be valid and within power, and the challenge to it failed.