Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether mixing different chemical fertilisers to produce NPK mixture amounts to manufacture of a new commodity so as to attract entry tax on the raw materials under the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979.
Analysis: For levy under item No. 80 of the First Schedule read with item No. 81 of the notification, the existence of manufacture of an intermediate or finished product is necessary. The controlling test is whether the process results in a commercially different and distinct commodity. Applying that test, the Court held that blending of various fertilisers does not bring into existence a new commercial product. The component fertilisers and the resultant NPK mixture remain fertilisers, used for the same purpose, and the mixture does not acquire a different commercial identity merely because different proportions are blended.
Conclusion: Mixing different chemical fertilisers to produce NPK mixture is not manufacture, and the entry of such fertilisers cannot be subjected to entry tax under the said provision and notification.
Final Conclusion: The revision petitions failed and the Tribunal's view was sustained, with the levy of entry tax on the fertilisers used for preparing NPK mixture set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: A process amounts to manufacture only if it results in a commercially new and distinct commodity; mere blending or mixing of fertilisers that remain commercially the same article is only processing and not manufacture.