Compensatory entry tax upheld, but Commissioner's circular struck down and levy made enforceable only prospectively.

Rajasthan entry tax on goods entering local areas was treated as compensatory and regulatory, with a nexus to local trading facilities and support for local bodies, so it did not offend Article 301 or require invalidation under Article 304(b). The Commissioner's circular expanding "tobacco" to cover cigarettes and other tobacco products was held ultra vires because the statute required specification by State Government notification in the Official Gazette. The levy became enforceable only after public publication of the clarificatory notification, so recovery was confined to 7 January 2000 onward.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1999 and the entry tax levied thereunder were unconstitutional as infringing the freedom of trade, commerce and intercourse under Article 301 of the Constitution of India and as not being saved by Article 304(b); (ii) whether the Commissioner's circular dated 23 October 1999, expanding the meaning of "tobacco" to include cigarettes and other tobacco products, was valid; and (iii) from what date the entry tax could be enforced against the petitioners.

Issue (i): Whether the Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1999 and the entry tax levied thereunder were unconstitutional as infringing the freedom of trade, commerce and intercourse under Article 301 of the Constitution of India and as not being saved by Article 304(b).

Analysis: The charging provision empowered the State to levy a tax on entry of goods into local areas up to the prescribed ceiling, and the scheme of the Act provided for assessment, appeals, revision and ancillary machinery. The Court treated the levy as compensatory and regulatory in character, noting the abolition of octroi, the need to support local bodies, and the existence of a nexus between the impost and trading facilities. On that basis, the levy was held not to operate as a direct or immediate restriction on trade. The Act was also held to fall within the State's legislative competence under Article 246(3) read with Entry 52 of List II.

Conclusion: The Act and the entry tax were held valid and not hit by Articles 301 or 304(b); this issue was decided against the petitioners.

Issue (ii): Whether the Commissioner's circular dated 23 October 1999, expanding the meaning of "tobacco" to include cigarettes and other tobacco products, was valid.

Analysis: The Act required the taxable goods to be specified by the State Government by notification in the Official Gazette, and any removal of difficulty also had to be done by the State Government by notification. The circular was issued by the Commissioner and purported to enlarge the scope of the State Government's notification by executive clarification. The Court held that such a clarification could not be issued by the Commissioner in the teeth of the statutory scheme. A later notification issued by the State Government was treated as the proper source of clarification, while the circular itself was found to be ultra vires.

Conclusion: The circular was quashed as illegal; this issue was decided in favour of the petitioners.

Issue (iii): From what date the entry tax could be enforced against the petitioners.

Analysis: The Court held that a notification in the Official Gazette must be published and made available to the public before it can operate. Since the clarificatory notification was published on 6 January 2000, it was taken to become operative from the following day. Applying the rule that publication and availability to the public are necessary, and preferring the construction favourable to the subject, the Court fixed the operative date as 7 January 2000.

Conclusion: The entry tax was held recoverable from 7 January 2000; this issue was decided in favour of the petitioners.

Final Conclusion: The constitutional challenge to the entry tax legislation failed, but the impugned Commissioner's circular was struck down and the levy was held enforceable only prospectively from 7 January 2000.

Ratio Decidendi: A State entry tax that is compensatory or regulatory in nature and imposed within the State's legislative field does not offend Article 301 or require compliance with Article 304(b), but the taxable goods and their incidence must be specified in the manner mandated by the statute and by lawful publication in the Official Gazette.

---