Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, while entertaining an appeal under section 39(1) read with the proviso to section 39(5) of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973, the appellate authority could impose a condition of furnishing surety bond and whether the petitioner was entitled to an opportunity before such condition was imposed.
Analysis: The proviso to section 39(5) permits entertainment of an appeal without full pre-deposit where the appellant is unable to pay the assessed tax, penalty or interest and the admitted amount has been paid, with reasons recorded in writing. The Court held that the appellate authority is not barred from imposing an appropriate condition while granting exemption from pre-deposit, but such power is discretionary and cannot be exercised on a rigid or mechanical basis. The requirement of surety or security is not mandatory in every case. The authority was also required to act fairly and give the appellant an opportunity to show inability to comply with the proposed condition. The cryptic order, lacking reasons and passed without such opportunity, amounted to non-application of mind and offended principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The condition imposed by the appellate authority could not be sustained in the manner adopted, and the matter had to be reconsidered after giving the petitioner an opportunity and recording proper reasons.
Ratio Decidendi: The appellate authority under the proviso to section 39(5) may impose reasonable conditions while relaxing pre-deposit, but such discretion must be exercised fairly, on relevant material, and after giving the appellant an opportunity to meet the proposed condition.