Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessment initiated under section 17(3) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, after no return was filed and after a long delay, was barred by limitation under section 19, and whether a form 51 notice or summons could save the limitation.
Analysis: The dealer had not filed the prescribed returns. In such a situation, the omission was treated as an escaped assessment rather than a mere regular best judgment assessment. Once the matter is one of escaped assessment, the limitation period under section 19 applies. A mere direction in form 51 to produce documents does not amount to the statutory notice required for proceedings under section 19, because it does not show that the assessing authority had commenced escaped-assessment proceedings. The notice issued nearly nine years after the end of the assessment year was therefore beyond time.
Conclusion: The assessment proceedings were barred by limitation and the assessment orders could not stand.
Final Conclusion: The revision was allowed and the assessment was set aside on the ground that proceedings for escaped turnover had not been initiated within the prescribed time.
Ratio Decidendi: Where no return is filed, the turnover is to be treated as escaped assessment and the assessment must be initiated within the limitation period applicable to escaped assessments; a mere summons to produce records does not satisfy that requirement.