Reason to Believe Requirement Invalidates Reopening Notice Without Disclosed Basis for Reassessment

A reopening notice under section 24 of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 must rest on a prima facie basis showing that turnover escaped assessment, was under-assessed, attracted a lower rate, or involved a wrongful deduction. The statutory requirement of reason to believe is a condition precedent, so a completed assessment cannot be reopened on the officer's bare assertion. While the reasons need not be stated in the notice itself, some identifiable foundation for the belief must exist. On that basis, the notice was held invalid and was quashed.

---

---

Issues: Whether a notice issued for reopening assessment under section 24 of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 was invalid for want of recorded reasons before its issuance.

Analysis: Section 24 permits reopening only where the Commissioner has reason to believe that turnover has escaped assessment, has been under-assessed, has been assessed at a lower rate, or deduction has been wrongly made. The existence of reason is a statutory condition precedent, and the assessing authority must at least indicate the basis for forming the prima facie belief. A completed assessment cannot be reopened on the mere ipse dixit of the officer. Although the statute does not require the reasons to be recorded in the notice itself, some indication of the basis for reopening must be available to justify the exercise of power.

Conclusion: The notice was invalid and was quashed; the petition was allowed without any adjudication on the merits of the assessment.

Ratio Decidendi: A reopening notice under a provision requiring "reason to believe" must rest on an identifiable basis for that belief, and a completed assessment cannot be reopened without some disclosed foundation for the action, even though the reasons need not be set out in the notice itself.

---