Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether turnover determined in the original assessment under section 12(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 could be deducted from the escaped turnover determined under section 16(1) of the same Act, and whether penalty had to be refixed on the full escaped turnover.
Analysis: The assessment under section 16(1) is confined to turnover that has escaped assessment and operates independently of the original assessment completed under section 12. The escaped turnover proceedings do not reopen or revise the original assessment, and the turnover already assessed cannot be set off against the turnover subsequently found to have escaped assessment. The Tribunal's approach of reducing the escaped turnover by reference to the earlier assessed turnover was therefore inconsistent with the scheme of section 16 and with the settled distinction between original assessment and assessment of escaped turnover. Since the escaped turnover was sustained at the higher figure, the penalty had to follow that sustained suppression.
Conclusion: The set-off allowed by the Tribunal was unsustainable, and the escaped turnover was liable to be fixed at Rs. 6,50,568 with penalty worked out on that basis.