Limited appellate standing under tax law is valid when confined to persons directly aggrieved by the impugned order.

A statutory right of appeal may validly be confined to persons actually aggrieved by an order imposing tax, penalty, refund liability, or similar statutory prejudice. Section 31(1) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act was held to create a rational classification tied to the object of tax assessment and collection, so it did not offend Articles 14, 19(1)(g) or 265. Because no assessment or demand was made against the petitioners, they had no enforceable appellate grievance under the provision, and the constitutional challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the expression "any person objecting to an order passed" in section 31(1) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 is discriminatory and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

Analysis: Section 31(1) confers a right of appeal on a person objecting to an order passed under the specified provisions of the Act, that is, a person against whom tax, penalty, refund or similar statutory liability is imposed. The provision is confined to persons actually aggrieved by the order and does not extend appellate standing to persons on whom no liability has been fastened. The classification is thus linked to the object of the statute, namely, levy and collection of tax and penalty, and does not create hostile discrimination. Since no assessment or demand was made against the petitioners, they had no enforceable appellate grievance under the section. The pleadings also disclosed no material to show curtailment of trade or business under Article 19(1)(g), and no levy or demand without authority of law so as to attract Article 265.

Conclusion: The impugned expression in section 31(1) is not violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) or 265, and the petitioners were not entitled to challenge the assessment order as appellants on the facts stated.

Final Conclusion: The constitutional challenge failed and the original petitions were dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: A statutory right of appeal may validly be confined to persons on whom the impugned order imposes a legal liability or other direct statutory prejudice, and such limitation does not offend Articles 14, 19(1)(g) or 265 when the classification is rationally connected with the object of the taxing statute.

---