Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ingot moulds imported from outside the State and used in the manufacture of steel products were covered by the exemption under S.R.O. No. 263 of 1998 and, on that basis, whether the demand for entry tax and penalty under the Kerala Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas Act, 1994 was sustainable.
Analysis: The exemption under S.R.O. No. 263 of 1998 applied to cement or iron and steel imported for use as raw materials in the manufacture of other goods, subject to the stated conditions. The Court held that the petitioners imported the goods inter-State, used them in the manufacturing process as raw materials, and the manufactured products were liable to tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act or the Central Sales Tax Act. The contention that exemption failed because the ingot moulds were first used as receptacles and later melted was rejected, as the notification did not impose a time-limit or require immediate consumption in the narrow sense advanced by the Revenue. The reading of the exemption was based on the plain wording of the notification, and the proposed levy could not override the express concession granted by the Government.
Conclusion: The ingot moulds were held to fall within the exemption, and the demand for entry tax and consequential penalty proceedings was without authority of law.