Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty could survive after the provisional assessment merged into the final assessment and the tax and interest demand stood deleted, when the case was found not to involve evasion, avoidance, or concealment of tax liability.
Analysis: The provisional assessment orders ceased to have independent existence after the final assessments were made. The factual position asserted by the assessee was accepted in the final assessments, and the entire tax and interest demand was deleted. On that basis, the matter was not one of evasion, avoidance, or concealment of tax liability. Once no tax liability remained, the foundation for imposing penalty disappeared. The availability of an appeal before the appellate authority did not justify refusing relief in the present proceedings.
Conclusion: The penalty could not be sustained and the demand notices relating to penalty were liable to be set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty cannot survive where the underlying tax liability has ceased and the proceedings disclose neither evasion nor avoidance nor concealment of tax.