Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application for sales tax exemption under Rule 28-A had to be filed within 90 days of the unit going into commercial production, and whether delay beyond that period could be condoned or the benefit granted retrospectively.
Analysis: Rule 28-A(5) required an eligible industrial unit seeking exemption to apply within 90 days of the date of commercial production or the date of commencement of the rule, whichever was later. The period prescribed was held to be mandatory. The rule contained no provision enabling any authority to condone delay or entertain an application filed after the stipulated period. The plea that exemption could still be claimed for the 90 days preceding the application was found contrary to the plain language and scheme of the rule. Commercial production was understood to begin when the unit first started sale of its products in the market.
Conclusion: The application having been filed beyond the prescribed period, rejection of the claim for exemption was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition failed because compliance with the 90-day filing requirement under the exemption rule was treated as a condition precedent, and belated applications were not entertainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a fiscal exemption rule prescribes a fixed period for making an application and does not provide for condonation, the limitation is mandatory and an application filed beyond that period cannot be entertained or granted retrospectively.