Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, where an eligible industrial unit was granted sales tax exemption under the incentive scheme and was prohibited from collecting tax on its sales, rule 50 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Rules, 1970 could be invoked to notionally reduce the sale price by treating it as inclusive of tax for computing the exemption benefit.
Analysis: Rule 50 applies where the sale price charged by a registered dealer actually contains an element of sales tax or general sales tax, either shown separately or embedded in the price, so that the taxable turnover can be ascertained by excluding the tax element. Where the dealer is not liable to pay tax and is not entitled to collect tax at all under the exemption scheme, the sale price does not contain any tax element in fact or in law. In such a case, there is no basis for assuming a legal fiction that the price includes tax or for reducing the actual turnover by a formula designed for sales on which tax is actually payable. Accepting such an approach would enlarge the exemption beyond the statutory limit and would alter the scheme by substituting a different yardstick for the one provided in the exemption notification.
Conclusion: Rule 50 had no application, and the question referred was answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A provision for deducting tax from sale price to determine taxable turnover cannot be invoked where the dealer is exempt from tax and prohibited from collecting any tax on the sales in question.