Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount covered by credit notes and discounts could be treated as tax collected by the dealer so as to justify forfeiture under section 18-AA of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: Section 18-AA authorises forfeiture only where an amount is collected by way of tax or purporting to be by way of tax in contravention of section 18. The expression "collected" is confined to amounts actually collected and retained as tax, and does not extend to sums merely billed, tentatively shown, or adjusted before the tax is finally received. If credit notes are issued before payment, or if the amount never reaches the dealer as tax collected from the buyer, forfeiture cannot follow. The factual question whether the disputed amount was in fact collected was not properly examined by the assessing authority.
Conclusion: The forfeiture order could not be sustained on the material as it stood, and the matter had to be reconsidered by the assessing authority on the question whether there was actual collection of tax.