Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether locally purchased defective coils, end cuttings and rejected steel materials, which were sold without any manufacturing process and had already suffered tax at the purchase stage, could be subjected to tax again, and whether set-off on such purchases was correctly denied.
Analysis: The goods sold as defective, rejected or end cuttings were not the result of any manufacturing activity and were merely segregated portions of steel coils and raw material found unsuitable for manufacture. Where tax had already been paid on the local purchase of such goods, the levy could not be repeated merely because the items were described as defective or rejected. The rule in relation to different commercial commodities arising out of manufacture did not apply to a case where there was no manufacturing transformation and the same taxed goods were only cut or separated and sold. At the same time, since no manufacturing was undertaken in respect of those items, the denial of set-off was correct on the statutory explanation governing manufactured goods.
Conclusion: The goods which had already suffered tax at the local purchase stage could not be taxed again when sold as defective, rejected or end cuttings, and the matter was remitted for exclusion of such local purchases from the tax computation. The denial of set-off was sustained to the extent that no manufacturing process was involved.