Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the concessional rate under G.O. Ms. No. 130, Revenue (CT-II) Department, dated 14 February 1989 applied to marble tiles sold by the assessee, and whether marble tiles fell under entry 43 of the First Schedule.
Analysis: The concessional rate notification was held applicable to tiles, and no distinction was made between different categories of tiles such as mosaic, marble, or granite. The challenge that marble tiles and marble articles fell under entry 43 of the First Schedule was not accepted. The principle that, in case of reasonable doubt as to the applicable entry in a tax schedule, the benefit goes to the assessee supported the classification adopted by the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The concessional rate applied to marble tiles, and the assessee's classification was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tax notification grants a concessional rate to tiles without distinguishing among categories of tiles, and the applicable entry is doubtful, the classification must be resolved in favour of the assessee.