Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sugar mill established at Tirumandankudi, Papanasam taluk was a new industry entitled to eligibility certificate and full waiver of sales tax under paragraph 3 of G.O. Ms. No. 500 dated May 14, 1990.
Analysis: The entitlement turned on the character of the unit. The Court examined the Government Order, which separately provided benefits for new industries set up in the most backward taluks and for existing industries undertaking expansion or diversification. The materials showed that the Tirumandankudi unit had been granted an industrial licence as a new industrial undertaking under the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, had separate plant and machinery, separate establishment and records, independent excise and factory licences, and had been recognised by governmental authorities and other regulatory bodies as a new unit. The Court held that the earlier remand order did not operate as res judicata against fresh consideration on the merits and that the first respondent had adopted an unduly narrow and erroneous approach by treating the unit as mere expansion.
Conclusion: The unit was held to be a new industry and the petitioner was held entitled to the benefit of paragraph 3 of G.O. Ms. No. 500 dated May 14, 1990.
Final Conclusion: The impugned rejection was set aside and the petitioner was directed to receive the statutory sales tax waiver benefit attached to the new unit.
Ratio Decidendi: For an industrial incentive scheme aimed at promoting new industries in backward areas, the decisive test is whether the unit is a distinct new industrial undertaking, to be determined on a liberal and purposive construction of the scheme and the surrounding regulatory materials, rather than by a narrow focus on the identity of the promoter company.