1998 (3) TMI 66 - HC - Income Tax

Tractors in factories not road transport vehicles for investment allowance

The Court ruled that tractors used solely for internal purposes in a factory or plantation do not qualify as road transport vehicles for investment ... Investment Allowance, Road Transport Vehicle Issues:Interpretation of the term 'road transport vehicles' for the purpose of investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Analysis:The case involved a dispute regarding the eligibility of a tractor for investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessing authority denied the investment allowance on the grounds that tractors are considered road transport vehicles. However, the Appellate Tribunal disagreed, stating that tractors used for internal purposes within a factory or plantation should not be classified as road transport vehicles. The Tribunal emphasized that a tractor, as per the Motor Vehicles Act, is not constructed to carry any load other than equipment for propulsion, excluding it from the definition of a road transport vehicle. The Tribunal's interpretation was supported by the definition of 'tractor' and 'transport vehicle' under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court concurred with the Tribunal's view, ruling that tractors used solely for internal purposes in a factory or plantation do not fall under the category of road transport vehicles. Therefore, the Court held that the assessing authority's classification of the tractor as a road transport vehicle was incorrect, and the assessee was entitled to claim the investment allowance, subject to fulfilling other conditions.This judgment clarifies the distinction between road transport vehicles and other motor vehicles for the purpose of claiming investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It underscores the importance of considering the specific use and construction of a vehicle in determining its classification. The Court's decision aligns with the Motor Vehicles Act's definition of a tractor and transport vehicle, emphasizing that a tractor primarily used for internal operations within a factory or plantation does not qualify as a road transport vehicle. The judgment provides clarity on the eligibility criteria for investment allowance in such cases, ensuring a consistent and accurate application of the law.