Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purposes of section 14 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, an overdraft or credit facility sanctioned by a bank can be treated as money belonging to the defaulting dealer and thereby made available for recovery of tax arrears.
Analysis: Section 14 fastens liability only on a person from whom money is due or may become due to the dealer, or who holds money for or on account of the dealer. An overdraft facility is a contractual arrangement by which the bank agrees to advance funds up to a sanctioned limit; it does not mean that the bank holds the dealer's money or owes an existing sum to the dealer merely because the facility has been sanctioned. Where the account remains in debit and there is no credit balance, there is no money of the dealer in the hands of the bank that can be attached for tax recovery.
Conclusion: An overdraft or credit facility cannot be treated as money due to the dealer for recovery under section 14, and the bank is not liable to remit such sanctioned credit limit to the tax department.
Ratio Decidendi: For garnishee-style recovery provisions, only money actually due to or held on account of the dealer is attachable, and a mere sanctioned overdraft limit does not constitute such money.