Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether computer stationery was covered by the concessional rate of sales tax under the relevant Government Orders and clarification memo, and whether the later Government Order continued that concession.
Analysis: The Court held that computer stationery did not fall within item 38 of the First Schedule as electronic equipment, parts or accessories, and that it was ordinarily paper under item 19 of the Sixth Schedule. However, reading the Government Orders, the memo and the Electronics Commission classification together, the Court found that the expression "electronic goods" had been understood by the department and trade to include consumables and peripherals, and that computer stationery had earlier been treated as eligible for concessional treatment. The Court further noted that the later Government Order repeated the definition but the clarificatory memo was not reissued, making it uncertain whether the omission was intentional.
Conclusion: The Court did not finally decide the entitlement under the later Government Order. It directed the Government to consider the matter, take a decision and notify it within three months, and permitted restoration of the appeals to await that clarification.