Record-requisition notices under sales tax law may stand without a fresh pending assessment if the purpose is clear from context.

A notice for production of records under section 14(1) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 may be issued for the purposes of the Act even where a fresh assessment proceeding has not formally commenced, if the surrounding context shows that proceedings are effectively pending for compliance with earlier directions. A notice is also not invalid merely because it refers to multiple assessment years, where the purpose of the requisition is sufficiently clear from the surrounding litigation and the assessee can understand the object of production. On that reasoning, the requisition notice was treated as valid and enforceable.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether a notice for production of records under section 14(1) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 could be issued in the absence of a pending proceeding. (ii) Whether the notice was invalid as an omnibus notice for several assessment years without specifying the purpose of the requisition.

Issue (i): Whether a notice for production of records under section 14(1) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 could be issued in the absence of a pending proceeding.

Analysis: Section 14(1) authorises a requisition of documents and records as may be deemed necessary for the purposes of the Act. In the setting of the earlier tribunal decisions, the Commercial Tax Officer was required first to determine the applicant's liability to tax and then, if necessary, proceed to assessment. That background meant that proceedings were effectively pending for the limited purpose of compliance with the earlier directions, and the notice could not be struck down merely because a fresh assessment had not yet commenced in the ordinary sense.

Conclusion: The notice was validly issued notwithstanding the objection that no pending proceeding existed.

Issue (ii): Whether the notice was invalid as an omnibus notice for several assessment years without specifying the purpose of the requisition.

Analysis: The notice mentioned a range of years and did not separately spell out the precise purpose of production. However, in the context of the earlier tribunal directions and the surrounding litigation, the applicant could understand that the requisition was for determining liability to tax and for consequential assessment proceedings. The omission to state the purpose expressly did not, by itself, vitiate the notice, and the objection of omnibus character was not accepted on these facts.

Conclusion: The notice was not bad as an omnibus notice and remained enforceable.

Final Conclusion: The challenge to the requisition notice failed, and the applicant was required to comply with the directions for production of records for the relevant years.

Ratio Decidendi: A notice for production of records under section 14(1) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 may be issued for the purposes of the Act even where no fresh assessment proceeding is formally pending, and such notice is not invalid merely because it covers multiple years if the purpose is clear from the surrounding context.

---