Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cables sold to a manufacturer setting up a new industry were exempt from sales tax under the notification granting exemption to the sale of machinery.
Analysis: The exemption applied only to the sale of machinery to a manufacturer holding a valid registration. The term "machinery" was not defined in the Act, so its ordinary and commercial meaning governed. On that meaning, machinery denotes a combination of mechanical contrivances working together to perform a specific function. Cables, when sold alone, do not ordinarily answer that description. They may become part of machinery if fitted with other components in a composite setup, but a bare sale of cables cannot automatically be treated as a sale of machinery. Since there was no finding whether the cables sold formed part of machinery or were intended to be assembled into machinery, the Tribunal had decided the matter without the necessary factual basis.
Conclusion: The exemption could not be upheld on the existing finding, and the matter required a fresh factual determination on the use and role of the cables.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption is confined to machinery and the statutory term is undefined, the word must be construed in its ordinary commercial sense, and cables sold separately do not qualify as machinery unless shown to form part of a composite machine.