Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Central Government was bound by promissory estoppel to continue the excise rebate granted by the exemption notification and whether the withdrawal of the rebate by the later notification was valid.
Analysis: The rebate was granted under the exemption power contained in rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and was held out as an incentive scheme for a fixed period. The petitioner altered its position and made investments in reliance on that representation. The doctrine of promissory estoppel was held applicable against the Government where a promise within its authority has been acted upon. A bare assertion that the scheme was later reviewed and withdrawn in public interest was held insufficient in the absence of particulars or supporting material. The withdrawal notification, issued before the expiry of the promised period, could not defeat the assurance already given.
Conclusion: The withdrawal of the excise rebate was invalid and the petitioner was entitled to enforcement of the original exemption scheme.
Final Conclusion: The impugned withdrawal was quashed and the writ petition succeeded on the basis that the Government was held to its earlier promise.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a governmental exemption or rebate granted under statutory power is acted upon and the promisee alters its position, the Government cannot withdraw the benefit before the promised period expires unless a legally sufficient justification is shown.