Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was right in permitting the assessee to raise, for the first time in second appeal, a new ground that certain transactions were in the nature of service and not sale, and therefore not exigible to tax.
Analysis: The appellate power of the Tribunal under the Act is wide enough to deal with questions of fact and law arising in the appeal. A new ground may be permitted where it does not alter the subject-matter of the appeal, and the subject-matter of the second appeal in this case remained the assessment and reassessment orders as challenged before the Tribunal. The additional plea went to the very liability to tax and the jurisdiction of the taxing authority, and the fact that it had not been urged before the lower authority did not bar its consideration at the appellate stage. The Tribunal therefore acted within its discretion in allowing the plea and remanding the matters for fresh disposal.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was right in law in allowing the assessee to raise the new ground, and the answer to the reference was in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the subject-matter of an appeal remains unchanged, a new ground affecting tax liability or jurisdiction may be permitted at the appellate stage even if it was not raised before the lower authority.