Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Section 4-B(5) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 could be imposed for using raw material purchased at concessional rate to manufacture pipe and pipe fittings specifically mentioned in the recognition certificate, and whether any subsequent amendment to the certificate could affect the assessment year in question.
Analysis: Section 4-B(5)(a) authorises penalty only where goods purchased under the recognition certificate are used for a purpose other than that for which the certificate was granted. The recognition certificate covered pipe and pipe fittings, and the raw material was used for manufacturing those very goods. On that footing, the use was not contrary to the certificate. Any later amendment of the certificate, even if made, would operate prospectively and could not govern the assessment year 1977-78.
Conclusion: Penalty was not leviable on the facts of the case, and the impugned notice was liable to be quashed.