Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notification enhancing the rate of tax on scooters could be enforced from the date borne on the Official Gazette when the assessee asserted that it was not made public or known to dealers until a later date.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that subordinate legislation must be published or promulgated in a manner that makes it reasonably known to the public before it can operate against persons affected by it. Mere printing of the notification with an earlier date was not enough on the facts, because the material showed that the assessee had no real means of knowing of the notification on that date and the respondents did not satisfactorily prove contemporaneous publication and public availability. The presumptions under the evidence law regarding official acts and official gazettes were treated as rebuttable on the facts of the case, and the assessee successfully displaced them.
Conclusion: The notification was not enforceable against the assessee from the date it bore, and the assessment based on the enhanced rate could not stand.
Ratio Decidendi: Subordinate legislation does not take effect against the public until it is duly published or otherwise promulgated in a reasonable and knowable form; a mere date on the gazette is insufficient where effective publication is not proved.