Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 36(3) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 is leviable on the additional tax paid on a revised return when the revised return itself was filed beyond the prescribed period but the tax was paid before submission of that return.
Analysis: Section 36(3) authorises penalty only where a dealer fails, without reasonable cause, to pay tax within the time required by or under the Act. In the case of a revised return under section 32(3), section 38(3) requires the additional tax to be paid before the revised return is submitted. The scheme of sections 32 and 38 treats the revised return separately from the original return and fixes the relevant date for payment with reference to the revised return itself, not the original return. Since the additional tax was admittedly paid before the revised return was filed, the statutory condition for penalty was not satisfied. The fact that the revised return was filed after the prescribed three-month period also did not create a basis for penalty on the facts found.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 36(3) was not leviable, and the answer to the reference was in favour of the assessee.