Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner was justified in cancelling the eligibility certificate granted under section 4-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948 on the ground of discontinuance of production for more than six months in one assessment year, and whether such breach could warrant cancellation for the entire exemption period.
Analysis: The eligibility certificate had been issued under an exemption scheme announced by Government order, and the order did not amount to a notification so as to automatically import the statutory proviso as a condition for cancelling the certificate for the whole period. The conditions in the proviso to section 4-A(1) were held to operate year-wise, because exemption under the provision is granted for successive assessment periods and the statutory scheme contemplates denial of exemption only for the particular year in which the conditions are breached. The grant of an eligibility certificate was treated as only a pre-condition for claiming exemption, while the actual allowance of exemption remained with the assessing authority for each assessment year.
Conclusion: The Commissioner was not justified in cancelling the eligibility certificate for the entire period, and the cancellation order could not stand.