Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed turnover represented sales of coir products or rubberised coir products, and whether exemption under the notification issued under section 17 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was available.
Analysis: The products were produced before the Tribunal and physically verified. On such verification, the Tribunal found that the goods were essentially coir products and that latex formed only a small portion only to give shape. It further found that rubber was not blended with the coir so as to characterise the goods as rubberised coir products. As the Tribunal was the final fact-finding authority and its conclusion was based on physical inspection of the goods, there was no ground to interfere with its finding that the turnover related to coir products.
Conclusion: The disputed turnover was held to be sales of coir products, and the assessee was entitled to exemption under the notification issued under section 17 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the fact-finding authority, on physical verification of the goods, concludes that the product is essentially exempt commodity and not a dutiable variant, its finding on classification and consequent exemption will ordinarily not be interfered with.