Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner could refuse to exercise suo motu revisional power under section 21(1) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 merely because the assessee had brought the mistake to notice, and whether purchase tax on cotton purchased before 29 March 1976 could be assessed at 4% instead of 3%.
Analysis: Section 21(1) confers on the Commissioner a revisional power to call for and examine subordinate proceedings for legality or propriety and to pass appropriate orders. That power is meant to remedy injustice and may be invoked when a mistake is brought to the Commissioner's notice by either the Revenue or the assessee; the source of information does not control the existence of jurisdiction. On the admitted facts, the rate of tax on purchase of cotton during 1 July 1975 to 28 March 1976 was 3%, and the enhancement to 4% operated only from 29 March 1976. An assessment at 4% for purchases made before the effective date was therefore a patent mistake.
Conclusion: The Commissioner ought to have exercised suo motu revisional powers and corrected the assessment. The assessment at 4% for the pre-29 March 1976 period was unsustainable and had to be rectified to 3%.
Ratio Decidendi: A revisional authority empowered to act suo motu may act on information supplied by the assessee, and an assessment made at a rate not in force on the relevant date is liable to correction as a patent error.