Just a moment...

Top
Help
The Most Awaited - AI Search is Live! 🚀

AI-powered research trained on the authentic TaxTMI database.

Launch AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>High Court: Scrap & Timber Sales Not Taxable under U.P. Trade Tax Act.</h1> The High Court ruled that the turnover of iron and steel scrap and timber sleepers sold by the dealer was not taxable under the U.P. Trade Tax Act. The ... Taxability of iron and steel scrap - definition of manufacture - cutting or sizing for transport not manufacture - single point tax on iron and steel including scrap - taxability of timber sold by non-forest entities or non-importersTaxability of iron and steel scrap - definition of manufacture - cutting or sizing for transport not manufacture - single point tax on iron and steel including scrap - Sales of iron and steel scrap by the dealer are not taxable under the U.P. Sales Tax Act (now U.P. Trade Tax Act) because the dealer was neither a manufacturer nor an importer of the goods. - HELD THAT: - The authorities below treated the dealer as a manufacturer on the basis of a remark in a sale-order indicating the purchaser had the right to cut the goods and on conjecture that rails were converted into scrap. The Court found no evidence that the dealer manufactured or imported iron/steel or its scrap; admissions recorded do not establish cutting or manufacture. The statutory scheme subjects iron and steel (including scrap) to single point tax at the sale by a manufacturer or importer. The definition of 'manufacture' cannot be stretched to treat mere cutting or sizing of goods (including cutting scrap for transport or convenience) as manufacture. Applying the principle that goods, when retaining their commercial identity despite finishing or processing, are not to be taxed again, the Court held the sales of scrap by the dealer were not taxable under the Act; the Tribunal erred in upholding taxability based on conjecture and the isolated remark in the sale-order. [Paras 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]Turnover of iron and steel scrap determined by the Tribunal is not liable to tax under the U.P. Sales Tax Act (now U.P. Trade Tax Act).Taxability of timber sold by non-forest entities or non-importers - Sales of old railway sleepers (timber) by the dealer are not taxable under the Act because the dealer is neither the Forest Department, the U.P. Forest Corporation, a private forest owner, nor an importer. - HELD THAT: - It was admitted that the old railway sleepers were purchased from the railways at Mughal Sarai and there was no evidence of importation from outside the State. The Act makes timber sales taxable when made by specified forest bodies or by importers; absent any of those statuses the dealer's sales of old railway sleepers could not be brought within the taxable class. Therefore the Tribunal's levy of tax on such turnover was unsustainable. [Paras 6, 7, 8, 17]Turnover of timber (old railway sleepers) determined by the Tribunal is not liable to tax under the U.P. Sales Tax Act (now U.P. Trade Tax Act).Final Conclusion: The revision petitions are allowed: the Tribunal's determinations as to quantum of turnover are upheld but those turnovers (iron and steel scrap and timber from railway sleepers) are held not taxable under the U.P. Sales Tax Act (now U.P. Trade Tax Act); parties to bear their own costs. Issues:1. Taxability of iron and steel scrap sales by the dealer.2. Taxability of turnover of timber sleepers sold by the dealer.Analysis:Issue 1: The main contention in this case was whether the sales of iron and steel scrap by the dealer were taxable under the U.P. Trade Tax Act. The assessing officer and appellate authorities held that the dealer was a manufacturer of scrap based on the cutting of goods purchased from the railway authorities. The dealer argued that unless it was established that they were a manufacturer or importer of iron and steel scrap, the turnover should not be taxed. The definition of 'manufacture' was crucial in determining tax liability, as cutting goods for transport was considered a form of manufacturing. However, the High Court held that cutting scrap into smaller pieces did not amount to manufacturing scrap and that the turnover of iron and steel scrap by the dealer was not taxable under the Act.Issue 2: The second issue involved the taxability of the turnover of timber sleepers sold by the dealer. The dealer purchased old railway sleepers from the railways in U.P. and sold them. The authorities had not provided any evidence that the dealer imported the sleepers from outside the state. The High Court ruled that since the dealer was not a Forest Department, U.P. Forest Corporation, private forest owner, or importer, the sale of old railway sleepers purchased within U.P. was not taxable under the Act.In conclusion, the High Court allowed the revision petitions and partly set aside the Tribunal's order, holding that the turnover of iron and steel scrap and timber sleepers determined by the Tribunal was not liable to tax under the U.P. Trade Tax Act. The parties were directed to bear their own costs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found