Audit note as valid information for reassessment when omission caused underassessment under the Surtax Act.

Reassessment under the Surtax Act was upheld where an audit note merely drew attention to the omission of rule 4 of the Second Schedule from the original capital-base computation and thereby exposed underassessment. Tax credit certificates under section 280ZB of the Income-tax Act were treated as not forming part of income merely because they were exempt, so their exclusion required proper consideration in surtax assessment. The Court distinguished an audit note supplying information on a matter escaped from the officer's notice from an audit opinion on law, and treated the former as valid information for reopening. Jurisdiction to initiate reassessment was therefore sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Income-tax Officer had valid jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings under the Surtax Act on the basis of an audit note concerning exclusion of tax credit certificates from the capital base.

Analysis: The charging scheme under the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act requires computation of chargeable profits and statutory deduction, and rule 4 of the Second Schedule permits diminution of capital only in respect of income, profits and gains not includible in total income as computed under Chapter III of the Income-tax Act. The Court held that tax credit certificates received under section 280ZB of the Income-tax Act were not part of income merely because they were exempt, and that the omission to consider rule 4 in the original assessment resulted in underassessment under the Surtax Act. Relying on the principle that an audit note can supply information as to law escaped from the officer's notice, but not an audit opinion on interpretation, the Court held that the audit party had only pointed out the omission and not expressed a binding legal view. Accordingly, the audit note constituted information for reopening under section 8(b) of the Surtax Act.

Conclusion: The Income-tax Officer had valid jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings, and the answer was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

Ratio Decidendi: An audit note that merely brings to the Assessing Officer's notice a legal provision omitted from the original assessment can constitute information for reassessment, but an audit opinion on the interpretation of law cannot; where the omission leads to underassessment, reassessment may validly be initiated.

---