Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a bank's gross receipts or turnover should be computed by aggregating its advances and banking investments, and whether only ten per cent of the adjusted expenditure on advertisement, publicity and sales promotion was therefore disallowable.
Analysis: The expression "turnover" is not ordinarily apt to banking activity, since banking is not a trading business in the usual sense. For a bank, the more appropriate expression is "gross receipts", and that expression cannot be equated with profit or gross income. In the context of banking, gross receipts refer to the total deposits received during the relevant accounting year. Advances and loans made by the bank, and repayment of amounts lent, do not constitute gross receipts for the purpose of section 37(3A). As the record did not disclose the deposits actually received during the year, the proper figure of gross receipts had to be ascertained from the assessee.
Conclusion: The answer to the referred question is in the negative. The Tribunal was not right in treating advances and investments as the bank's turnover or gross receipts for section 37(3A); the matter was remitted for determination of the deposits received and consequent disallowance.
Ratio Decidendi: For a bank, "gross receipts" under section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 means deposits received during the relevant year, and not advances, loans, investments, or repayments of amounts lent.