Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants, as a sick industrial company, were entitled to the protection of section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 against initiation of certificate proceedings and prohibition of operation of their bank account for recovery of sales tax and interest.
Analysis: Protection under section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 applies only when one of the statutory conditions exists, namely pendency of an inquiry under section 16, preparation or consideration of a scheme under section 17, implementation of a sanctioned scheme, or pendency of an appeal under section 25. The record showed that the earlier sanctioned rehabilitation scheme had failed and had not been implemented. The Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction had required a revised scheme, but none was submitted and no scheme was under preparation or consideration after the relevant date. In these circumstances, the statutory foundation for invoking the protective bar against recovery proceedings was absent.
Conclusion: The applicants were not entitled to protection under section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, and the certificate proceedings and the impugned bank account restraint were not invalid on that ground.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 is attracted only when the specific statutory preconditions are actually in existence; where the sanctioned rehabilitation scheme has failed and no scheme is under preparation, consideration, or implementation, recovery proceedings are not barred.