Incomplete statement of case on container taxability led to remand for reformulated legal reference.

A reference on the taxability of container cost could not be answered because the statement of case did not set out the material facts needed to decide whether the sale price approved by the State Government included container charges or whether there was an implied contract for sale of containers. The court noted that the definition of sale price and its Explanation indicate that, where goods are sold with packing material or containers, their price is included in the sale price. As the record was incomplete, the references were remanded to the Tribunal for re-statement of the case and for a properly framed question of law after factual clarification.

---

---

Issues: Whether the reference applications should be remanded to the Tribunal for re-statement of the case and a reformulated question of law, the original question being obscure and not reflecting the correct factual position.

Analysis: The question referred was found to be inadequately framed for answering the controversy, because the material facts needed to decide whether the price of containers was separately taxable, whether the sale price approved by the State Government was inclusive of container cost, and whether there was any implied contract of sale of containers were not sufficiently stated. The statutory definition of sale price under Section 2(o) and the clarifying Explanation indicated that, where goods are sold with packing material or containers, the price of such material is to be included in the sale price. As the case stated did not enable a proper legal answer, the matter required additional factual clarification and a properly framed reference.

Conclusion: The references were remanded to the Tribunal under Section 44(4) of the Act for re-statement of the case and for reference of the reformulated question of law.

Final Conclusion: No substantive answer on the taxability issue was given, and the matters were sent back for fresh formulation of the reference after necessary factual clarification.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the statement of case does not disclose the facts necessary to answer the referred question of law, the proper course is to remand the matter for re-statement and reframing of the question rather than decide the issue on an incomplete record.

---