Commission expenditure disallowance upheld where year-specific facts justified the Tribunal's reasonable estimate

Commission expenditure was assessed on the facts of each year, and the Tribunal's estimate was upheld because no change in circumstances was shown to warrant interference. The Court accepted that the allowable commission deduction depended on year-specific factual findings and declined to disturb the factual conclusion that a disallowance of Rs. 40,000 was reasonable. The question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Department.

---

---

Issues: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in sustaining a disallowance of Rs. 40,000 out of the commission payments claimed by the assessee.

Analysis: The disallowance for commission expenditure had varied in the earlier assessment years on the basis of the facts found for each year, and the Tribunal had upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)'s estimate for the year under consideration. The Court held that the quantum of allowable commission expenditure depended on the facts of each assessment year. As no change in circumstances was shown to justify interference, the Court declined to disturb the Tribunal's factual conclusion that the disallowance of Rs. 40,000 was reasonable.

Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the Department.

---