1996 (3) TMI 512 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Hotel business accounts defects not substantial. Assessing officer, appellate decisions overturned. Accounts accepted for assessment.

The court concluded that the defects identified in the accounts of the hotel business were not substantial enough to warrant rejection, given the unique ... - Issues Involved:1. Rejection of accounts due to defects.2. Estimation of taxable turnover.3. Validity of defects identified by the assessing officer.4. Peculiarities of the hotel business impacting account maintenance.5. Justification for rejection of accounts based on inspection findings.6. Reduction of estimated taxable turnover by appellate authorities.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Rejection of accounts due to defects:The petitioner, an assessee in the hotel business, received a notice under section 17(3) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, pointing out various defects in the accounts. These defects included the absence of inventory for opening and closing stock, unsupported purchases, and the lack of sales bills or chitta. The assessing officer deemed these defects sufficient to reject the accounts and resort to estimation.2. Estimation of taxable turnover:The assessing officer estimated a taxable turnover of Rs. 5,10,991.40 based on the identified defects and invited objections from the assessee. The objections raised by the assessee highlighted the peculiarities of the hotel business, such as the impracticality of maintaining an inventory for perishable items and the common practice of not having purchase bills for daily necessities like milk and vegetables.3. Validity of defects identified by the assessing officer:The defects identified included the absence of stock inventory, unsupported purchases, lack of sales bills, taxable sales turnover of containers, inter-State purchases of soft drinks, and the number of employees indicating a higher turnover than declared. The assessee contended that these defects were either not applicable or did not justify the rejection of the accounts.4. Peculiarities of the hotel business impacting account maintenance:The court acknowledged the peculiarities of the hotel business, emphasizing that maintaining rigorous inventory records for perishable items and daily necessities is impractical. The court noted that the objections raised by the assessee regarding the peculiarities of the hotel business were not adequately considered by the authorities.5. Justification for rejection of accounts based on inspection findings:The inspection conducted on November 28, 1985, revealed excess stock in several items. However, the court found that the authorities did not provide sufficient material to justify the rejection of accounts based on these findings. The court emphasized that the situational peculiarities of the hotel business should be considered, and the defects identified did not provide a justifiable basis for rejecting the accounts.6. Reduction of estimated taxable turnover by appellate authorities:The first appellate authority reduced the estimation from 40% to 25% and made minor adjustments regarding curd and empties. The appellate Tribunal confirmed the rejection of accounts and the resort to estimation, but the court found that all three authorities failed to address the jurisdictional question satisfactorily.Conclusion:The court concluded that the defects identified were not sufficient to justify the rejection of the accounts, considering the peculiarities of the hotel business. The court quashed and set aside the orders of the assessing officer, the first appellate authority, and the appellate Tribunal. The court directed the assessing authority to accept the accounts as submitted and proceed with the assessment accordingly. The petition was allowed.