Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed under section 45-B(2) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 was justified when the dealer had collected tax because the purchasing entity had not furnished form XII-J and later refunded the amount.
Analysis: The statutory scheme prohibited collection of tax only when such collection was in contravention of section 45-B(1). On the admitted facts, the dealer was a registered dealer and collected tax at the applicable rate because the purchaser had not produced form XII-J at the time of sale. The collection was therefore made in accordance with the Act and was not illegal or unauthorised merely because the amount was later refunded after the form was furnished. Section 45-B(2) could operate only where there was illegal collection, and the record disclosed no deliberate violation or dishonest intent warranting penal action.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 45-B(2) was not sustainable and the question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty for collection of tax can be imposed under section 45-B(2) only when the collection is contrary to law, and a collection made bona fide in the absence of the prescribed exemption form does not become illegal merely because it is later refunded.