Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods imported as "Matt-Top" and "Icasolv-TL-460" were lacquers covered by Notification No. 759-F.T. dated March 29, 1994 under section 25 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954, so that a prior sales tax permit was required.
Analysis: The materials were examined with reference to the supplier's literature, invoices, industrial licence, and technical literature. The description used by the manufacturer and in the invoices identified the goods as lacquers and varnishes, and the tariff references also supported that characterisation. The argument that the goods were used only in the leather industry was held not to exclude them from the notified entry, because the notification covered lacquers as goods by identity and did not qualify them by end-use. The Tribunal also held that the expression in the notification had to be read according to the technical and commercial understanding of the goods, and that paint and lacquer are distinct commodities, with lacquer expressly included in the notification.
Conclusion: The goods were held to be notified lacquers, and the applicant was required to obtain a sales tax permit before import; the seizure was upheld.