Concessional purchase declarations require actual use as component parts; raw materials alone can trigger penalty for misuse.

Under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, concessional purchase on form XVII is confined to goods used as identifiable component parts of the finished product; goods consumed merely as raw materials do not satisfy section 3(3). On that reading, aluminium ingots used to manufacture aluminium conductors were not component parts, so the declaration was not properly available. Failure, without reasonable excuse, to use the goods for the declared purpose also attracts penalty under section 23, read with sections 3(3) and 45(2)(e), as an anti-avoidance measure. The narrower view limiting penalty to resale as spare parts was rejected.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether penalty under section 23 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, is attracted when goods purchased on form XVII declaration are not used as component parts of the finished goods but are consumed as raw materials. (ii) Whether the goods purchased by the assessee satisfied the requirement of use as a component part under section 3(3) of the Act.

Issue (i): Whether penalty under section 23 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, is attracted when goods purchased on form XVII declaration are not used as component parts of the finished goods but are consumed as raw materials.

Analysis: Section 23 operates in conjunction with section 3(3) and section 45(2)(e) of the Act. The scheme of the provisions shows that the concessional purchase is allowed only for use as a component part of goods specified in the First Schedule, and failure without reasonable excuse to use the goods for the declared purpose exposes the purchaser to both prosecution under section 45(2)(e) and penalty under section 23. The later view in Tube Investments was preferred because section 23 is intended as an anti-avoidance measure and cannot be confined only to cases where the very goods are resold as spare parts. The earlier view in Elgi Equipments was held to have overlooked the interrelationship of the provisions and the object of the statute.

Conclusion: Penalty under section 23 is attracted on failure to use the goods for the declared purpose, and the narrower contrary view was overruled.

Issue (ii): Whether the goods purchased by the assessee satisfied the requirement of use as a component part under section 3(3) of the Act.

Analysis: Section 3(3), read with its explanation, requires that the purchased goods must form an identifiable constituent of the finished product. Goods merely used as raw materials do not satisfy that test. Aluminium ingots used in the manufacture of aluminium conductors were held to be raw materials and not component parts within the meaning of the provision or the declaration in form XVII.

Conclusion: The assessee did not satisfy the requirement of section 3(3), and the concessional purchase declaration was not properly available.

Final Conclusion: The assessee's challenge to the penalty failed, the reference was answered in favour of the Revenue, and the appeal was dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: Penalty under section 23 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, is recoverable when a purchaser who obtained concessional purchase by declaration fails to use the goods for the declared purpose; the provision is not confined to resale as spare parts and must be read with sections 3(3) and 45(2)(e) as an integrated anti-avoidance scheme.

---