Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a sales tax return sent by post under certificate of posting could be treated as validly filed in time when it was not accompanied by proof of deposit of the full tax due, and whether penalty for delayed filing was therefore leviable.
Analysis: The statutory scheme required the return to be furnished within the prescribed time and to be accompanied by a receipt showing deposit of the full tax due on the basis of the return. The rules permitted presentation personally or by post, but they also provided that if the return was not accompanied by the required tax receipt, the assessing authority was not bound to take cognizance of it. The certificate of posting could at best show posting of a cover and did not establish that a valid return, complete in law, had been filed. Since the tax for the relevant quarter was deposited only after the alleged posting date, the return could not be treated as compliant with the Act and Rules, and the question whether the cover reached the authority became immaterial.
Conclusion: The return was not validly filed in time, and the penalty for delayed filing was rightly imposed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute makes deposit of the tax due an essential accompaniment to the return, posting of the return by certificate of posting does not amount to valid filing unless the return is legally complete and compliant with the prescribed requirements.